[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027130407.GB32628@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:04:07 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] percpu: allow pcpu_alloc() to be called with IRQs
off
* Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> Jiri Kosina wrote:
> > pcpu_alloc() and pcpu_extend_area_map() perform a series of
> > spin_lock_irq()/spin_unlock_irq() calls, which make them unsafe
> > with respect to being called from contexts which have IRQs off.
> >
> > This patch converts the code to perform save/restore of flags instead,
> > making pcpu_alloc() (or __alloc_percpu() respectively) to be called
> > from early kernel startup stage, where IRQs are off.
> >
> > This is needed for proper initialization of per-cpu rq_weight data from
> > sched_init().
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
>
> Acked-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
>
> I'll wait for response on the series and push it through percpu#fixes
> tomorrow if there's no objection.
Yep, the 2/2 sched.c patch looks good now:
Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists