linux-kernel - _RET_IP_ VS __builtin_return

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2674af740910270719u2b097eb5n6a4a5019d5646f0a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 22:19:14 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: _RET_IP_ VS __builtin_return_address(0)

Hi,

With a grep search, I find the usage of _RET_IP_ and __builtin_return_address(0)
in current kernel:
_RET_IP_           __builtin_return_address(0)
     89                                128
Actually this isn't matter with the runtime behavior.
But I'm wondering if there is any trend to unify this kind of usage?

Thanks,
Yong
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/