[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027143043.GI6645@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:30:43 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sofirq: make rcu_irq_enter()/rcu_irq_exit() called in
pairs
On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 04:00:11PM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
>
> irq_enter() calls rcu_irq_enter() unconditionally,
> the same as irq_exit() calls rcu_irq_exit().
>
> It does not change the binary because rcu_irq_enter()
> is dummy when !CONFIG_NO_HZ.
>
> It's just a cleanup.
This does look like a nice cleanup! I will pull it in and test it.
Yes, it should be provably the same, but RCU has taught me to be quite
paranoid. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/softirq.c b/kernel/softirq.c
> index f8749e5..21939d9 100644
> --- a/kernel/softirq.c
> +++ b/kernel/softirq.c
> @@ -302,9 +302,9 @@ void irq_exit(void)
> if (!in_interrupt() && local_softirq_pending())
> invoke_softirq();
>
> + rcu_irq_exit();
> #ifdef CONFIG_NO_HZ
> /* Make sure that timer wheel updates are propagated */
> - rcu_irq_exit();
> if (idle_cpu(smp_processor_id()) && !in_interrupt() && !need_resched())
> tick_nohz_stop_sched_tick(0);
> #endif
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists