| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <26080408.post@talk.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:10:02 -0700 (PDT) From: Patrik Kluba <kpajko79@...il.com> To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: PREEMPT_RCU on UP Hi! Does the preemptible RCU implementation have better performance (lower latency?) than the classic RCU implementation on embedded uniprocessor systems? I can't find any information about this in Documentation/. Regards, Patrik Kluba -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/PREEMPT_RCU-on-UP-tp26080408p26080408.html Sent from the linux-kernel mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists