lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:14:43 -0700 (PDT) From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...il.com> To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, git <git@...r.kernel.org>, mercurial@...enic.com, Marti Raudsepp <marti@...fo.org> Subject: Re: git vs hg commit counts? Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes: > I'm comparing linux-kernel git vs hg repositories. > > While testing some changes to scripts/get_maintainer.pl, > I noticed that git and hg have different commit counts > for the same files. > > For instance: > > $ git log --since=1-year-ago -- MAINTAINERS | \ > grep -P "^commit [0-9a-f]{40,40}$" | wc -l > 514 > > $ hg log --template="commit {node}\n" --date -365 -- MAINTAINERS | \ > grep -P "^commit [0-9a-f]{40,40}$" | wc -l > 601 > > Anyone have any understanding why? It *might* be caused by the fact that in Mercurial commit can have only up to two parents. This means that octopus merges (merge commits with more than two parents: there are a few of them in linux-kernel history) have to be represented as a set of two-parent merges. -- Jakub Narebski http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast/1599930#1599930 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists