[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3zl7dd4g6.fsf@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:14:43 -0700 (PDT)
From: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, git <git@...r.kernel.org>,
mercurial@...enic.com, Marti Raudsepp <marti@...fo.org>
Subject: Re: git vs hg commit counts?
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> writes:
> I'm comparing linux-kernel git vs hg repositories.
>
> While testing some changes to scripts/get_maintainer.pl,
> I noticed that git and hg have different commit counts
> for the same files.
>
> For instance:
>
> $ git log --since=1-year-ago -- MAINTAINERS | \
> grep -P "^commit [0-9a-f]{40,40}$" | wc -l
> 514
>
> $ hg log --template="commit {node}\n" --date -365 -- MAINTAINERS | \
> grep -P "^commit [0-9a-f]{40,40}$" | wc -l
> 601
>
> Anyone have any understanding why?
It *might* be caused by the fact that in Mercurial commit can have
only up to two parents. This means that octopus merges (merge commits
with more than two parents: there are a few of them in linux-kernel
history) have to be represented as a set of two-parent merges.
--
Jakub Narebski
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1598759/git-and-mercurial-compare-and-contrast/1599930#1599930
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists