[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091027102251.244ee681@nehalam>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 10:22:51 -0700
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, opurdila@...acom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
viro@...iv.linux.org.uk
Subject: [PATCH] net: fold network name hash
The full_name_hash does not produce a value that is evenly distributed
over the lower 8 bits. This causes name hash to be unbalanced with large
number of names. A simple fix is to just fold in the higher bits
with XOR.
This is independent of possible improvements to full_name_hash()
in future.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
--- a/net/core/dev.c 2009-10-27 09:21:46.127252547 -0700
+++ b/net/core/dev.c 2009-10-27 09:25:14.593313378 -0700
@@ -199,7 +199,11 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(dev_base_lock);
static inline struct hlist_head *dev_name_hash(struct net *net, const char *name)
{
unsigned hash = full_name_hash(name, strnlen(name, IFNAMSIZ));
- return &net->dev_name_head[hash & ((1 << NETDEV_HASHBITS) - 1)];
+
+ hash ^= (hash >> NETDEV_HASHBITS);
+ hash &= NETDEV_HASHENTRIES - 1;
+
+ return &net->dev_name_head[hash];
}
static inline struct hlist_head *dev_index_hash(struct net *net, int ifindex)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists