lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:20:10 -0700 From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org> To: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com> CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>, kurt.hackel@...cle.com, the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@...citrix.com>, zach.brown@...cle.com, chris.mason@...cle.com, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 3/5] x86/pvclock: add vsyscall implementation On 10/27/09 10:29, Dan Magenheimer wrote: > Is there any way for an application to conclusively determine > programmatically if the "fast vsyscall" pvclock is functional > vs the much much slower gettimeofday/clock_gettime equivalents? > > If not, might it be possible to implement some (sysfs?) > way to determine this, that would also be backwards compatible > to existing OS's that don't have pvclock+vsyscall supported? > It would probably be simplest and most portable for the app to just measure the performance of gettimeofday and see if it meets its needs. J -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists