[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091026.181922.261475236.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 18:19:22 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: hancockrwd@...il.com
Cc: phdm@...qel.be, linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH ide] : Increase WAIT_DRQ to support slow CF cards
From: Robert Hancock <hancockrwd@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:07:18 -0600
> libata only busy-waits for 50 microseconds, if not set then it sleeps
> for 2ms and polls for another 10 microseconds, if still not set it
> tries the whole thing again at 16ms intervals. Only after (typically)
> 30 seconds does it give up.
Porting that kind of logic over to IDE is a non-starter.
It's easier to get people to move over to using the ATA layer for
their devices.
Meanwhile we should provide a way for things to work, and
realistically the only way to do that currently is to bump the
WAIT_DRQ value to some large number.
And that's exactly the kind of patch I'm willing to accept for this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists