[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910271422090.22335@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:27:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>
cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: add numa node symlink for memory section in
sysfs
On Tue, 27 Oct 2009, Alex Chiang wrote:
> Thank you for ACKing, David.
>
> S390 guys, I cc'ed you on this patch because I heard a rumour
> that your memory sections may belong to more than one NUMA node?
> Is that true? If so, how would you like me to handle that
> situation?
>
You're referring to how unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes() should be
handled, right? register_mem_sect_under_node() already looks supported by
your patch.
Since the unregister function includes a plural "nodes," I assume that
it's possible for hotplug to register a memory section to more than one
node. That's probably lacking on x86 currently, however, because we lack
node hotplug.
I'd suggest a similiar iteration through pfn's that the register function
does checking for multiple nodes and then removing the link from all
applicable node_devices kobj when unregistering.
Maybe one of the s390 maintainers will test that?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists