linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 06/10] bootmem: refactor free_all_bootmem

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091028073432.GA19402@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:34:32 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, chrisw@...s-sol.org,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, joerg.roedel@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/10] bootmem: refactor free_all_bootmem_core


* FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> From: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
> 
> Move the loop that frees all bootmem pages back to page allocator into
> its own function.  This should have not functional effect and allows the
> function to be reused later.
> 
> Reviewed-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>
> Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>

Small signoff-handling sidenote: in such cases (when you are handling 
other people's patches) the expected workflow is to add your SOB line 
after Chris's line, instead of the Reviewed-by line.

I.e. it should look like this:

  Signed-off-by: Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>
  Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@....ntt.co.jp>

Showing the path of the patch - ending with your signoff.

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/