[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0910280159380.7122@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 02:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>
cc: Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Badari Pulavarty <pbadari@...ibm.com>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/5] mm: add numa node symlink for memory section in
sysfs
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> The short answer is: s390 doesn't support NUMA, because the hardware doesn't
> tell us to which node (book in s390 terms) a memory range belongs to.
>
> Memory layout for a logical partition is striped: first x mbyte belong to
> node 0, next x mbyte belong to node 1, etc...
>
> Also, since there is always a hypervisor running below Linux I don't think
> it would make too much sense if we would know to which node a piece of
> memory belongs to: if the hypervisor decides to schedule a virtual cpu of
> a logical partition to a different node then what?
>
Ok, so the patchset is a no-op for s390 since it only utilizes the
!CONFIG_NUMA code.
Alex, I think the safest thing to do in unregister_mem_sect_under_nodes()
is to iterate though the section pfns and remove links to the node_device
kobjs for all the distinct pfn_to_nid()'s that it encounters.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists