lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:42:08 +0100 From: Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com> To: Mel LKML <mel.lkml@...il.com> Cc: Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com>, Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, Sven Geggus <lists@...hsschwanzdomain.de>, Tobias Oetiker <tobi@...iker.ch>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, Reinette Chatre <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Kalle Valo <kalle.valo@....fi>, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>, Mohamed Abbas <mohamed.abbas@...el.com>, Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>, "John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>, Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@...net.com>, Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Candidate fix for increased number of GFP_ATOMIC failures V2 On Sat, Oct 24, 2009 at 02:46:56PM +0100, Mel LKML wrote: > Hi, Hi, > On 10/23/09, Karol Lewandowski <karol.k.lewandowski@...il.com> wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 06:58:10PM +0200, Karol Lewandowski wrote: > > Ok, I've tested patches 1+2+4 and bug, while very hard to trigger, is > > still present. I'll test complete 1-4 patchset as time permits. Sorry for silence, I've been quite busy lately. > And also patch 5 please which is the revert. Patch 5 as pointed out is > probably a red herring. Hwoever, it has changed the timing and made a > difference for some testing so I'd like to know if it helps yours as > well. I've tested patches 1+2+3+4 in my normal usage scenario (do some work, suspend, do work, suspend, ...) and it failed today after 4 days (== 4 suspend-resume cycles). I'll test 1-5 now. Thanks. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists