linux-kernel - Re: RFC: Updating the LKML bug reporting/updating framework

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:44:18 +0100
From:	Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:	Robert Bradbury <robert.bradbury@...il.com>
Cc:	Thomas Backlund <tmb@...driva.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: RFC: Updating the LKML bug reporting/updating framework


> Given the bugzilla database, is the LKML with its high volume and
> noise level (IMO), now largely obsolete [1]?  (I think I a Google
> search may have led me in the direction that it was the place to
> report bugs).
> 
> 1. Is there an lkml-interesting sublist (or do subscribers need to
> make up their own filters)?

There's (or was?) lkml summary podcast ...
									Pavel


-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/