[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091028093131.0f8d8340@hskinnemoen-d830>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:31:31 +0800
From: Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>
To: "Thiago A. Corrêa" <thiago.correa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, kernel@...32linux.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Andrew Victor <avictor.za@...il.com>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3 v2] at91/atmel-mci: inclusion of sd/mmc driver in
at91sam9g45 chip and board
Thiago A. Corrêa <thiago.correa@...il.com> wrote:
> >> Causes at91_set_gpio_input() to be called for pin -1. Which shouldn't be valid.
> >> AT91 platforms use 0 to indicate an un-connected GPIO pin, so the
> >> assignment of "wp_pin" should probably just be removed.
> >
> > The mci driver expects non-existent pins to have a negative value, as
> > do all other drivers which use gpio_is_valid().
> >
>
> Then I think it would be best to use GPIO_PIN_NONE. Makes it clear
> what is expected and avoids confusion on what should be the proper
> value.
Unfortunately, GPIO_PIN_NONE only exists on AVR32.
> I hope I'm not saying non-sense, but even if I am, I guess you can see
> that I'm advocating against the magic numbers :)
IIRC, the correct way to specify a non-existent pin is to use -ENODEV.
Haavard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists