lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:03:07 -0700 From: Roland Dreier <rdreier@...co.com> To: Mike Travis <travis@....com> Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Hidetoshi Seto <seto.hidetoshi@...fujitsu.com>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86, mce: disable MCE if cpu has no MCE banks > > But would we want to accumulate all the different combinations of banks > > along with a CPU mask and then print something like: > > > > CPUs 0 4: MCA banks CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 CMCI:6 SHD:8 > > CPUs 1 2 3 5 6 7: MCA banks CMCI:2 CMCI:3 CMCI:5 SHD:6 SHD:8 > > CPUs 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15: MCA banks SHD:2 SHD:3 SHD:5 SHD:6 SHD:8 > > Or use a cpumask and cpulist_scnprintf which condenses the cpu list nicely. Thanks! I didn't know about that API. However with that said I think the real issue is whether that style of output is a good idea, no matter how nicely the CPU list is formatted :) - R. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists