[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE8C520.6020100@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:26:40 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: Kenji Kaneshige <kaneshige.kenji@...fujitsu.com>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Alex Chiang <achiang@...com>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bjorn.helgaas@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pci: pciehp update the slot bridge res to get big range
for pcie devices
Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> Which means your patch would cause a regression in my setup.
>> ok, may need to compare new range size and old range size before clear it.
>
> after closing look up the code, it looks it will not break your setup.
>
> 1. before the patches:
> a. when master card is inserted, all bridge in that card will get assigned with min_size
> b. when new cards is inserted to those slots in master card, will get assigned in the bridge size.
>
> 2. after the patches: v5
> a. booted up, all leaf bridge mmio get clearred.
> b. when master card is inserted, all bridge in that card will get assigned with min_size, and master bridge will be sum of them
> c. when new cards is inserted to those slots in master card, will get assigned in the bridge size.
>
> can you check those two patches in your setup to verify it?
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/56344/
> http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/56343/
on top Jesse today's PCI tree.
YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists