[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091028153551.6c665ca1.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 15:35:51 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl>
Cc: linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] [resend] thermal: improvements re. forced passive
cooling
On Mon, 26 Oct 2009 08:38:58 +0100
Frans Pop <elendil@...net.nl> wrote:
>
> Please consider this patch set for 2.6.32. It was previously submitted
> for 2.6.31, but AFAICT it has not yet been picked up.
>
> All patches have been acked by either Rui or Matthew, with the
> exception of 1/6 and 4/6, but the entire series has been implicitly
> acked by Rui in http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918#c26.
>
> The patch set closes http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13918.
>
> Andrew, could you take the set just in case?
>
I'm trying to work out what the actual bug is in here.
afacit some KDE tool put wrong numbers into /proc files, acpi didn't
sanity check them sufficiently and permitted the CPU to overheat, yes?
There seems to be rather a lot of non-bugfix stuff in this patch
series. Perhaps too much for 2.6.32, and a real problem if we want to
backport something into 2.6.31.x and earlier.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists