[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE8D005.1030302@twiddle.net>
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2009 16:13:09 -0700
From: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>
To: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
CC: linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ink@...assic.park.msu.ru, David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Alpha: suspicious compiler warning in entry.S
On 10/28/2009 12:03 AM, Michael Cree wrote:
> I am wondering whether it might be better
> to rearrange the bits in the thread information flags so that
> _TIF_WORK_MASK
> has a value less than 255 and the single instruction to perform an and
> operation can be maintained.
It would be better to rearrange TIF_NODIFY_RESUME down to 3.
In fact, you might as well rearrange the ones currently occupying
3-7 up to 8 and leave a hole for _TIF_WORK_MASK expansion, and
add a nice comment there at the same time.
r~
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists