[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1256807967.7158.58.camel@marge.simson.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 10:19:27 +0100
From: Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
hpa@...or.com, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: Re: [patch] Re: [regression bisect -next] BUG: using
smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000] code: rmmod
On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 10:14 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> hm, the problem is kthread_bind(). It is rummaging around in scheduler
> internals without holding the runqueue lock - and this now got exposed.
> Even though it is operating on (supposedly ...) inactive tasks, the guts
> of that function should be moved into sched.c and it should be fixed to
> have proper locking.
Yeah, I was thinking that nobody should ever be able to hit that without
it being a bug.. but wimped out.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists