[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091029131944.GN10727@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:19:44 +0100
From: Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>
To: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
Cc: Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cfq-iosched: simplify prio-unboost code
On Mon, Oct 26 2009, Corrado Zoccolo wrote:
> Eliminate redundant checks.
>
> Signed-off-by: Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>
> ---
> block/cfq-iosched.c | 8 +++-----
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/block/cfq-iosched.c b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> index 6e9b395..244bc8a 100644
> --- a/block/cfq-iosched.c
> +++ b/block/cfq-iosched.c
> @@ -2611,12 +2611,10 @@ static void cfq_prio_boost(struct cfq_queue *cfqq)
> cfqq->ioprio = IOPRIO_NORM;
> } else {
> /*
> - * check if we need to unboost the queue
> + * unboost the queue (if needed)
> */
> - if (cfqq->ioprio_class != cfqq->org_ioprio_class)
> - cfqq->ioprio_class = cfqq->org_ioprio_class;
> - if (cfqq->ioprio != cfqq->org_ioprio)
> - cfqq->ioprio = cfqq->org_ioprio;
> + cfqq->ioprio_class = cfqq->org_ioprio_class;
> + cfqq->ioprio = cfqq->org_ioprio;
> }
Not sure I see much gain in that, the previous code makes it explicit
that it may not be different and avoid dirtying cfqq if it isn't.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists