[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <F7D530D6-304E-4B99-8143-9E197AF8D74E@simula.no>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:48 +0100
From: Andreas Petlund <apetlund@...ula.no>
To: William Allen Simpson <william.allen.simpson@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
shemminger@...tta.com, ilpo.jarvinen@...sinki.fi,
davem@...emloft.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] net: TCP thin linear timeouts
Den 28. okt. 2009 kl. 04.20 skrev William Allen Simpson:
> Sorry to be too picky about the naming, but "rm_expb" really doesn't
> mean what is actually done. Perhaps TCP_THIN_LINEAR_BACKOFF and
> sysctl_tcp_thin_linear_backoff?
>
I agree that the name should be changed. As it represents linear
timeouts and does not back off exponentially, I suggest
TCP_THIN_LINEAR_TIMEOUTS and sysctl_tcp_thin_linear_timeouts.
> Also, as debated on some other recent patches, shouldn't the global
> sysctl specify the default, and the per socket option specify the
> forced override?
The rationale behind the suggested model is to allow the modifications
to be forced active in cases where the application that generates the
thin stream is proprietary, legacy, or that the code for other reasons
can not be modified (as is the case, for instance, for many game
clients).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists