[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3k4yew2rv.fsf@hase.home>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:03:48 +0100
From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@...hat.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: "Joseph S. Myers" <joseph@...esourcery.com>,
linux-api@...r.kernel.org, lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <onestero@...hat.com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...glemail.com>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...glemail.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETLK64 conflict
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> writes:
> On Sun, 2009-10-04 at 12:35 +0000, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>> In asm-generic/fcntl.h, F_SETOWN_EX and F_GETLK64 both have value 12, and
>> F_GETOWN_EX and F_SETLK64 both have value 13. I don't see how this is
>> going to work correctly. See
>> <http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-ports/2009-10/msg00013.html>.
>
>
> Ugh,.. yeah, non obvious collision that.
>
> How about something like:
That really needs to be fixed before 2.6.32.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, schwab@...hat.com
GPG Key fingerprint = D4E8 DBE3 3813 BB5D FA84 5EC7 45C6 250E 6F00 984E
"And now for something completely different."
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists