[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AE93FCA.3030203@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:10:02 +0800
From: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf events: Remove CONFIG_EVENT_PROFILE
> There's a logistical complication: this rename couples the pending perf
> tree with the pending tracing tree and that makes dependencies a bit
> awkward.
>
> Would you mind to resend this patch in the merge window, to be merged
> soon after both the perf events and the tracing tree went uptream?
>
> The rename/elimination itself looks fine and simple and shouldnt break
> anything, so we dont need to have it in the tracing and perf trees for
> long.
>
Sure, I'll keep the patch for now.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists