linux-kernel - Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <38b2ab8a0910300533l4bbc9d3cj8812fe38726c8278@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 13:33:56 +0100
From:	Francis Moreau <francis.moro@...il.com>
To:	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Netdev List <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: WARNING: at net/ipv4/af_inet.c:154 inet_sock_destruct

On Fri, Oct 30, 2009 at 12:27 PM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This oops occurring again and again with SUNRPC finally gave me the right pointer.
>
> David, we added two years ago memory accounting to UDP, and this changed
> requirements about calling skb_free_datagram() in the right context.
>
> I wish we had an ASSERT_SOCK_LOCKED() debugging facility :(
>
> Francis, would you please test following patch ?

I'm applying it and testing it during a couple of days and see if
something wrong still happens.

Since I have no specific test case, I'll report if this oops happen
again after a couple of days (probably on next Wednesday).

-- 
Francis
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/