| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.OSX.1.10.0910301020150.30808@caridad.icculuslan> Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:54:33 -0400 (EDT) From: "Ryan C. Gordon" <icculus@...ulus.org> To: Rayson Ho <raysonlogin@...il.com> cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: FatELF patches... > Can we first find out whether it is safe from a legal point of view?? > After the SCO v. IBM lawsuit, we should be way more careful. Does anyone have a spare patent lawyer? I'm not against changing my patch to work around a patent, but not knowing _how_ to change it, or if it needs changing at all? That's maddening. --ryan. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists