linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for October 30

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AEB068F.3020607@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:30:23 -0400
From:	Gregory Haskins <gregory.haskins@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC:	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for October 30

Hi Stephen

Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Changes since 20091029:
> 

< snip >

> Merging alacrity/linux-next
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in drivers/net/Kconfig
> CONFLICT (content): Merge conflict in lib/Kconfig

So I've noticed this error in your reports for a while now, but I wasn't
quite sure if there was an action-item for me to address it.

Considering no one is complaining that the tree is broken, I assume
these kinds of conflicts are automatically resolved, but I am wondering
if there are steps I should take to prevent the conflict in the future?

Kind Regards,
-Greg

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (268 bytes)