[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEA36D0.8000106@snapgear.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 10:44:00 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
CC: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] m68knommu: Move __init_end out of the .init section.
Hi Sam,
Sorry for the slow response.
Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 02:41:38PM +1000, Greg Ungerer wrote:
>> Hi Tim,
>>
>> Tim Abbott wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Tim Abbott <tabbott@...lice.com>
>>> ---
>>> arch/m68knommu/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S | 2 ++
>>> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/arch/m68knommu/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S b/arch/m68knommu/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> index 73fe172..49d5c4d 100644
>>> --- a/arch/m68knommu/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> +++ b/arch/m68knommu/kernel/vmlinux.lds.S
>>> @@ -169,6 +169,8 @@ SECTIONS {
>>> CON_INITCALL
>>> SECURITY_INITCALL
>>> INIT_RAM_FS
>>> + } > INIT
>>> + .init_end : {
>>> . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
>>> __init_end = .;
>>> } > INIT
>>
>> After applying this I can no longer boot.
>>
>> Resulting headers for vmlinux are:
>>
>> vmlinux: file format elf32-m68k
>>
>> Sections:
>> Idx Name Size VMA LMA File off Algn
>> 0 .text 00125ff0 40020000 40020000 00002000 2**4
>> CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, READONLY, CODE
>> 1 .data 00012010 40145ff0 40145ff0 00127ff0 2**4
>> CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, DATA
>> 2 .init 0000b608 40158000 40158000 0013a000 2**2
>> CONTENTS, ALLOC, LOAD, CODE
>> 3 .init_end 000009f8 40163608 40163608 00145608 2**0
>> ALLOC
>> 4 .bss 0000a9ec 40164000 40164000 00145608 2**4
>> ALLOC
>> 5 .comment 00001c56 00000000 00000000 00145608 2**0
>> CONTENTS, READONLY
>
> Took a look at this trying to understand why this
> caused a non-booting system.
>
> The previous post should have created a section named "init_begin",
> but it is not present in the above.
> I think this is beacuse the section had a zero size and thus
> got ignored by the linker.
>
> An the linker is allowed to rearrange sections so the concept
> with a init_begin, init_end sections looks wrongs.
> We do not know the order of these sections and they may
> be linked in a different order than what we expect.
>
> I think the better solution is to use the same section name
> several times like this:
>
> .init : {
> . = ALIGN(PAGE_SIZE);
> __init_end = .;
> } > INIT
>
> We should do this both for begin and end.
> Then the linker will not fool us and try to rearrange stuff.
> And we do not end up with zero sized sections.
>
> Greg - I assume the boot failed when it tried to free initmem.
No, it was very early - no console trace even. I didn't check
in logbuf to see what early kernel boot messages there where.
I'll try Tim's next set and see where that gets to.
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@...pgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
825 Stanley St, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Woolloongabba, QLD, 4102, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists