[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091030192050.06a0f706.sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2009 19:20:50 +1100
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the percpu tree with Linus' tree
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the percpu tree got a conflict in mm/percpu.c
between commit 403a91b1659cb149dbddc5885f892734ae4542d8 ("percpu: allow
pcpu_alloc() to be called with IRQs off") from Linus' tree and commit
0f5e4816dbf38ce9488e611ca2296925c1e90d5e ("percpu: remove some sparse
warnings") from the percpu tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc mm/percpu.c
index d907971,e2e80fc..0000000
--- a/mm/percpu.c
+++ b/mm/percpu.c
@@@ -369,7 -364,8 +367,8 @@@ static struct pcpu_chunk *pcpu_chunk_ad
* RETURNS:
* 0 if noop, 1 if successfully extended, -errno on failure.
*/
-static int pcpu_extend_area_map(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk)
+static int pcpu_extend_area_map(struct pcpu_chunk *chunk, unsigned long *flags)
+ __releases(lock) __acquires(lock)
{
int new_alloc;
int *new;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists