linux-kernel - Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20091030110616.GB6150@ff.dom.local>
Date:	Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:06:16 +0000
From:	Jarek Poplawski <jarkao2@...il.com>
To:	Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
Cc:	Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@...il.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linville@...driver.com
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless-next-2.6 2009-10-28

On 30-10-2009 08:00, Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-10-29 at 22:48 +0100, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
>> I don't think that my technical arguments are pointless.
>>
>> Quite the contrary, I'm pretty confident that addressing my review concerns
>> would result in better RT28x00 / RT30x0 support in the very near future.
> 
> So you know how to make the driver better, whine that it doesn't work,
> but don't help out either. Hey, good way to collaborate!
> 
>>> It should be pretty obvious by now that the best way to improve things
>>> is to work with the relevant maintainers, not against them. (Unless
>>> you wish your work to be ignored, of course.)
>> I work with a lot of other maintainers.  I would say that providing valuable
>> review feedback is also "working with" (at least I would be very happy with
>> such feedback in my projects).
> 
> Face it though, people have read your feedback, thought about it, and
> decided to disagree. You seem to have a childish problem with that,
> appealing to higher authority to get your way just makes you look more
> childish.

There are various ways to disagree, and ignoring by John questions
from a merited developer both in this referenced lkml and current
threads looks at least strange (if not offensive) as well.

Jarek P.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/