[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257156790.4492.4.camel@wall-e>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:13:10 +0100
From: Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] proc: remove /proc/*/status "Stack usage:"
> Poor embedded people!
>
That's why embedded peoble don't like to contribute their work.
> There is even Documentation/vm/page-types.c which is trivially adapted
> to show stack pages state.
>
> > Like Dr Frank. N. Furter in the "Rocky Horror Picture Show" says: remove
> > the cause but NOT the symptoms!
>
> The root of the problem is that you're measuring badly defined value.
>
> Kernel doesn't know SP register of a running task until it stops it.
> Even if task is stopped or inside kernel, kernel doesn't know where
> userpace stack starts, because, in theory, application can move it's
> stack to anywhere.
>
It works fine for 99% percent of the use cases. Nothing is perfect,
especially in theory.
> > And the cause is the miss implemented KSTK_ESP in a x86_64. I also
> > checked all other architekture depended KSTK_ESP definitions and this
> > definitions looks okay for me.
BTW: I had fixed the x86_65 KSTP_ESP implementation. I tested it with 32
bit and 64 bit user space application. I will send soon a patch. Thanks
for figure out the problem.
Stefani
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists