[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200911022100.EAC21893.OMFFJVOSOQHLtF@I-love.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 21:00:06 +0900
From: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
To: nhorman@...driver.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6.32-rc5-git5] synchronize_sched() inside spin_lock()?
Commit: 4ea7e38696c7e798c47ebbecadfd392f23f814f9
tracepoint_synchronize_unregister() calls synchronize_sched(), but it is
between spin_lock() and spin_unlock(). Is it OK?
static int set_all_monitor_traces(int state)
{
int rc = 0;
struct dm_hw_stat_delta *new_stat = NULL;
struct dm_hw_stat_delta *temp;
spin_lock(&trace_state_lock);
switch (state) {
case TRACE_ON:
rc |= register_trace_kfree_skb(trace_kfree_skb_hit);
rc |= register_trace_napi_poll(trace_napi_poll_hit);
break;
case TRACE_OFF:
rc |= unregister_trace_kfree_skb(trace_kfree_skb_hit);
rc |= unregister_trace_napi_poll(trace_napi_poll_hit);
tracepoint_synchronize_unregister();
/*
* Clean the device list
*/
list_for_each_entry_safe(new_stat, temp, &hw_stats_list, list) {
if (new_stat->dev == NULL) {
list_del_rcu(&new_stat->list);
call_rcu(&new_stat->rcu, free_dm_hw_stat);
}
}
break;
default:
rc = 1;
break;
}
if (!rc)
trace_state = state;
spin_unlock(&trace_state_lock);
if (rc)
return -EINPROGRESS;
return rc;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists