[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091102150525.GB5785@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:05:25 +0000
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>
Cc: Antonio Ospite <ospite@...denti.unina.it>,
openezx-devel@...ts.openezx.org,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Mike Rapoport <mike@...pulab.co.il>,
Daniel Ribeiro <drwyrm@...il.com>
Subject: Re: Using statically allocated memory for platform_data.
On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:00:11PM +0000, Ben Dooks wrote:
> This looks like something is freeing stuff that it did not allocate in
> the first place, which is IMHO bad. The call platform_device_alloc()
> is setting platform_device_release() as the default release function
> but platform_device_release() releases more than platform_device_alloc()
> actually created.
>
> My view is that platform_device_alloc()'s default release shouldn't
> be freeing the platform data, and that using platform_device_add_data()
> or platform_device_add_resources() should change either the behvaiour
> of platform_device_release() or it should change the pointer to a new
> release function.
That doesn't work - how do those other functions (adding) know what data
has also been added by other functions? That can't work reliably.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists