[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEEF878.2090805@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 17:19:20 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
CC: kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/11] Add "wait for page" hypercall.
On 11/02/2009 05:13 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 03:05:11PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>
>> On 11/01/2009 01:56 PM, Gleb Natapov wrote:
>>
>>> We want to be able to inject async pagefault into guest event if a guest
>>> is not executing userspace code. But in this case guest may receive
>>> async page fault in non-sleepable context. In this case it will be
>>> able to make "wait for page" hypercall vcpu will be put to sleep until
>>> page is swapped in and guest can continue without reschedule.
>>>
>> What's wrong with just 'hlt' and checking in the guest?
>>
>>
> Halting here will leave vcpu with interrupt disabled and this will prevent
> "wake up" signal delivery.
Page faults can be delivered with interrupts disabled.
> Enabling interrupts is also not an options
> since we can't be sure that vcpu can process interrupt at this point.
>
That's too bad, allowing interrupts in this context can help maintain
responsiveness.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists