[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-7a7732bc0f7c46f217dbec723f25366b6285cc42@git.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 16:16:40 GMT
From: tip-bot for Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...hat.com,
ebiederm@...ssion.com, garyhade@...ibm.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu
Subject: [tip:x86/apic] x86: Unify fixup_irqs() for 32-bit and 64-bit kernels
Commit-ID: 7a7732bc0f7c46f217dbec723f25366b6285cc42
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/7a7732bc0f7c46f217dbec723f25366b6285cc42
Author: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
AuthorDate: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:24:31 -0800
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CommitDate: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:56:34 +0100
x86: Unify fixup_irqs() for 32-bit and 64-bit kernels
There is no reason to have different fixup_irqs() for 32-bit and
64-bit kernels. Unify by using the superior 64-bit version for
both the kernels.
Signed-off-by: Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Gary Hade <garyhade@...ibm.com>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
LKML-Reference: <20091026230001.562512739@...-t61.sc.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
---
arch/x86/kernel/irq.c | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c | 45 -----------------------------------
arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c | 58 ---------------------------------------------
3 files changed, 59 insertions(+), 103 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
index 3912061..3ea6655 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq.c
@@ -276,3 +276,62 @@ void smp_generic_interrupt(struct pt_regs *regs)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vector_used_by_percpu_irq);
+
+#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
+/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
+void fixup_irqs(void)
+{
+ unsigned int irq;
+ static int warned;
+ struct irq_desc *desc;
+
+ for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
+ int break_affinity = 0;
+ int set_affinity = 1;
+ const struct cpumask *affinity;
+
+ if (!desc)
+ continue;
+ if (irq == 2)
+ continue;
+
+ /* interrupt's are disabled at this point */
+ spin_lock(&desc->lock);
+
+ affinity = desc->affinity;
+ if (!irq_has_action(irq) ||
+ cpumask_equal(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
+ spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+ continue;
+ }
+
+ if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
+ break_affinity = 1;
+ affinity = cpu_all_mask;
+ }
+
+ if (desc->chip->mask)
+ desc->chip->mask(irq);
+
+ if (desc->chip->set_affinity)
+ desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, affinity);
+ else if (!(warned++))
+ set_affinity = 0;
+
+ if (desc->chip->unmask)
+ desc->chip->unmask(irq);
+
+ spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
+
+ if (break_affinity && set_affinity)
+ printk("Broke affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
+ else if (!set_affinity)
+ printk("Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
+ }
+
+ /* That doesn't seem sufficient. Give it 1ms. */
+ local_irq_enable();
+ mdelay(1);
+ local_irq_disable();
+}
+#endif
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
index 7d35d0f..10709f2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_32.c
@@ -211,48 +211,3 @@ bool handle_irq(unsigned irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
return true;
}
-
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-
-/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
-void fixup_irqs(void)
-{
- unsigned int irq;
- struct irq_desc *desc;
-
- for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
- const struct cpumask *affinity;
-
- if (!desc)
- continue;
- if (irq == 2)
- continue;
-
- affinity = desc->affinity;
- if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
- printk("Breaking affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
- affinity = cpu_all_mask;
- }
- if (desc->chip->set_affinity)
- desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, affinity);
- else if (desc->action)
- printk_once("Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
- }
-
-#if 0
- barrier();
- /* Ingo Molnar says: "after the IO-APIC masks have been redirected
- [note the nop - the interrupt-enable boundary on x86 is two
- instructions from sti] - to flush out pending hardirqs and
- IPIs. After this point nothing is supposed to reach this CPU." */
- __asm__ __volatile__("sti; nop; cli");
- barrier();
-#else
- /* That doesn't seem sufficient. Give it 1ms. */
- local_irq_enable();
- mdelay(1);
- local_irq_disable();
-#endif
-}
-#endif
-
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
index 977d8b4..acf8fbf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/irq_64.c
@@ -62,64 +62,6 @@ bool handle_irq(unsigned irq, struct pt_regs *regs)
return true;
}
-#ifdef CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
-/* A cpu has been removed from cpu_online_mask. Reset irq affinities. */
-void fixup_irqs(void)
-{
- unsigned int irq;
- static int warned;
- struct irq_desc *desc;
-
- for_each_irq_desc(irq, desc) {
- int break_affinity = 0;
- int set_affinity = 1;
- const struct cpumask *affinity;
-
- if (!desc)
- continue;
- if (irq == 2)
- continue;
-
- /* interrupt's are disabled at this point */
- spin_lock(&desc->lock);
-
- affinity = desc->affinity;
- if (!irq_has_action(irq) ||
- cpumask_equal(affinity, cpu_online_mask)) {
- spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
- continue;
- }
-
- if (cpumask_any_and(affinity, cpu_online_mask) >= nr_cpu_ids) {
- break_affinity = 1;
- affinity = cpu_all_mask;
- }
-
- if (desc->chip->mask)
- desc->chip->mask(irq);
-
- if (desc->chip->set_affinity)
- desc->chip->set_affinity(irq, affinity);
- else if (!(warned++))
- set_affinity = 0;
-
- if (desc->chip->unmask)
- desc->chip->unmask(irq);
-
- spin_unlock(&desc->lock);
-
- if (break_affinity && set_affinity)
- printk("Broke affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
- else if (!set_affinity)
- printk("Cannot set affinity for irq %i\n", irq);
- }
-
- /* That doesn't seem sufficient. Give it 1ms. */
- local_irq_enable();
- mdelay(1);
- local_irq_disable();
-}
-#endif
extern void call_softirq(void);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists