[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <19182.22063.788927.708332@cargo.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 14:46:55 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@...mens.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@....de>
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] perf/core: Provide a kernel-internal interface to get to performance counters
Frederic Weisbecker writes:
> /*
> + * perf_event_create_kernel_counter
> + * MUST be called from a kernel thread.
Why? The reason for this requirement isn't obvious to me. It would
be good to have the reason documented in the comment for the sake of
people modifying the code in future.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists