[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091102171147.GG21750@bolzano.suse.de>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:11:47 +0100
From: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
To: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Linux-Kernel Mailinglist <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/27] BKL: Push down BKL from do_new_mount() to the filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation
On Mon, Nov 02, Jan Blunck wrote:
> I've read through all the code formerly covered by the BKL inside
> do_kern_mount() and have satisfied myself that it doesn't need the BKL
> any more.
>
> do_kern_mount() is already called without the BKL when mounting the rootfs
> and in nfsctl. do_kern_mount() calls vfs_kern_mount(), which is called
> from various places without BKL: simple_pin_fs(), nfs_do_clone_mount()
> through nfs_follow_mountpoint(), afs_mntpt_do_automount() through
> afs_mntpt_follow_link(). Both later functions are actually the filesystems
> follow_link inode operation. vfs_kern_mount() is calling the specified
> get_sb function and lets the filesystem do its job by calling the given
> fill_super function.
>
> Therefore I think it is safe to push down the BKL from the VFS to the
> low-level filesystems get_sb/fill_super operation.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck <jblunck@...e.de>
> Cc: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>
Attached is a new version of the patch that includes the changes for
filesystems outside of fs/ directory as well. Besides that I trimmed the CC
list this time.
Cheers,
Jan
View attachment "0001-BKL-Push-down-BKL-from-do_new_mount-to-the-filesyste.patch" of type "text/x-patch" (82523 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists