| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20091101.222755.200487074.davem@davemloft.net> Date: Sun, 01 Nov 2009 22:27:55 -0800 (PST) From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net> To: icculus@...ulus.org Cc: alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk, mans@...sr.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: FatELF patches... From: "Ryan C. Gordon" <icculus@...ulus.org> Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2009 21:21:47 -0500 (EST) > That being said, there are lots of places where using a package > manager doesn't make sense: Yeah like maybe, just maybe, in an embedded system where increasing space costs like FatELF does makes even less sense. I think Alan's arguments against FatELF were the most comprehensive and detailed, and I haven't seem them refuted very well, if at all. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists