[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEF4DAC.9080905@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:22:52 -0600
From: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
To: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
CC: cmm@...ibm.com, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
Andreas Dilger <adilger@....com>, linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/ext4: test the i_flags field of the right structure
Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
>
> Elsewhere, EXT4_EXTENTS_FL is combined with EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags, rather
> than inode->i_flags.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julia Lawall <julia@...u.dk>
Reviewed-by: Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...hat.com>
>
> ---
> fs/ext4/inode.c | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> index 5c5bc5d..c0e34ab 100644
> --- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
> @@ -2787,7 +2787,7 @@ static int ext4_da_writepages_trans_blocks(struct inode *inode)
> * number of contiguous block. So we will limit
> * number of contiguous block to a sane value
> */
> - if (!(inode->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) &&
> + if (!(EXT4_I(inode)->i_flags & EXT4_EXTENTS_FL) &&
> (max_blocks > EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA))
> max_blocks = EXT4_MAX_TRANS_DATA;
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-ext4" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists