linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH -tip perf/probes 00/10] x86 insn decoder bugfixes and perf-probe syntax changes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AEF55AB.50701@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 02 Nov 2009 16:56:59 -0500
From:	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>
To:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ibm.com>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Jason Baron <jbaron@...hat.com>,
	"K.Prasad" <prasad@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	systemtap <systemtap@...rces.redhat.com>,
	DLE <dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip perf/probes 00/10] x86 insn decoder bugfixes and
 perf-probe syntax changes

Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 04:16:25PM -0500, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>> What we want here is two fold:
>>>>
>>>>     - enable kprobes event support when perf events is enabled and kprobes
>>>>       is enabled. We dont want another config option for it.
>>>
>>> Sure, at least that combination should enable kprobe-tracer forcibly.
>>
>> Hmm, someone may not want to enables kprobe-tracer. Perhaps,
>> "default y if (EVENT_PROFILE)" is enough, isn't it?
>>
>
>
> I guess it should be sufficient yeah. We want to strongly recommend
> the kprobe events if we have enabled perf, but we don't want to force
> it.
>
> Also in this case we need a verbose runtime report of the lack of this
> tracer in debugfs from perf probe if needed.

Sure, error message should be changed as warning user to enable
CONFIG_KPROBE_TRACER :-)

Thank you,

-- 
Masami Hiramatsu

Software Engineer
Hitachi Computer Products (America), Inc.
Software Solutions Division

e-mail: mhiramat@...hat.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/