[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20091102155543.E60E.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 15:59:28 +0900 (JST)
From: KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
Cc: kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com,
Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: OOM killer, page fault
> On Mon, 2 Nov 2009 13:24:06 +0900 (JST)
> KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > (Cc to linux-mm)
> >
> > Wow, this is very strange log.
> >
> > > Dear all,
> > >
> > > (please Cc)
> > >
> > > With 2.6.32-rc5 I got that one:
> > > [13832.210068] Xorg invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x0, order=0, oom_adj=0
> >
> > order = 0
>
> I think this problem results from 'gfp_mask = 0x0'.
> Is it possible?
>
> If it isn't H/W problem, Who passes gfp_mask with 0x0?
> It's culpit.
>
> Could you add BUG_ON(gfp_mask == 0x0) in __alloc_pages_nodemask's head?
No.
In page fault case, gfp_mask show meaningless value. Please ignore it.
pagefault_out_of_memory() always pass gfp_mask==0 to oom.
mm/oom_kill.c
====================================
void pagefault_out_of_memory(void)
{
unsigned long freed = 0;
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&oom_notify_list, 0, &freed);
if (freed > 0)
/* Got some memory back in the last second. */
return;
/*
* If this is from memcg, oom-killer is already invoked.
* and not worth to go system-wide-oom.
*/
if (mem_cgroup_oom_called(current))
goto rest_and_return;
if (sysctl_panic_on_oom)
panic("out of memory from page fault. panic_on_oom is selected.\n");
read_lock(&tasklist_lock);
__out_of_memory(0, 0); <---- here!
read_unlock(&tasklist_lock);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists