[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4AEEAA82.8070705@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 11:46:42 +0200
From: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: percpu/kvm/tip tree build failure
On 11/02/2009 07:17 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed like this:
>
> kernel/user-return-notifier.c: In function 'fire_user_return_notifiers':
> kernel/user-return-notifier.c:45: error: expected expression before ')' token
>
> Introduced by commit 7c68af6e32c73992bad24107311f3433c89016e2 ("core,
> x86: Add user return notifiers") from the tip and kvm trees but revealed
> by commit e0fdb0e050eae331046385643618f12452aa7e73 ("percpu: add __percpu
> for sparse") from the percpu tree. Before that percpu tree commit,
> "put_cpu_var()" would compile without error (even though it really needs
> a parameter).
>
> I have applied the following patch for today.
>
Ingo, can you queue this on x86/entry?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists