lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1257233165.22553.1.camel@wall-e>
Date:	Tue, 03 Nov 2009 08:26:05 +0100
From:	Stefani Seibold <stefani@...bold.net>
To:	Américo Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fix X86_64 procfs provide stack information for threads

Am Dienstag, den 03.11.2009, 13:58 +0800 schrieb Américo Wang:
> On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 11:47:09AM +0100, Stefani Seibold wrote:
> >--- linux-2.6.32-rc5/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-10-16 02:41:50.000000000 +0200
> >+++ linux-2.6.32-rc5.new/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h	2009-11-02 10:39:47.177909657 +0100
> >@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@
> > #include <linux/threads.h>
> > #include <linux/math64.h>
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> >+//#include <linux/sched.h>
> 
> Hey, what is this? :)
> 
Garbage :-( I will resend the patch without!

> Except this, this patch looks fine for me:
> 
> Reviewed-by: WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ