linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] atmel_lcdfb Kconfig: remove long dependency line

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4AF04148.8070103@atmel.com>
Date:	Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:42:16 +0100
From:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
CC:	Haavard Skinnemoen <haavard.skinnemoen@...el.com>,
	plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.arm.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avictor.za@...il.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] atmel_lcdfb Kconfig: remove long dependency line

I come back on this patch as I have a Kconfig cleanup patch series coming.

Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 04:12:54PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> Haavard Skinnemoen :
>>> Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>>> +config ARCH_ATMEL_HAS_FB
>>>> +	bool
>>>> +	depends on FB
>>>> +	default n
>>> What happens when we unconditionally select something which depends on
>>> something else?
>> :-P
>>
>> Experience shows that this configuration is selected.
>>
>> The dependency allows to have a good hierarchy in the configuration tree...
>> Better proposition welcome.
> 
> 1st - no need for 'default n' - you're specifying something that's already
> the default.

Ok.

> 2nd - don't make this symbol depend on anything, and don't use the symbol
> for anything except providing a dependency for FB_ATMEL.  Instead, let
> FB_ATMEL deal with the dependency on FB and ARCH_ATMEL_HAS_FB.

The problem is that if I do not setup the dependency here the menu entry
will not be available at the proper level. In fact I will see the Atmel
LCD entry here:
"Graphics support"
 <*> Support for frame buffer devices  --->
 <*> AT91/AT32 LCD Controller support

instead of here:
"Graphics support"
 ---> "Support for frame buffer devices"
      [..]
      <*> "AT91/AT32 LCD Controller support"
      [..]

So I keep the depend.

> 3rd - ISTR we have a convention for these - 'HAVE_foo' for a configuration
> option named 'foo'.  So it should probably be HAVE_FB_ATMEL.

Ok, changed to HAVE_FB_ATMEL indeed.

Thanks. Best regards,
-- 
Nicolas Ferre

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/