[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6599ad830911021811n7ccf7a70y6939ac581381c22f@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 2 Nov 2009 18:11:33 -0800
From: Paul Menage <menage@...gle.com>
To: Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: bblum@...rew.cmu.edu, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] cgroups: support for module-loadable subsystems
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 6:03 PM, Li Zefan <lizf@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> I doubt the value of module-loadable subsystems. A cgroup subsystem
> is usually a kernel resource controller, and normally it needs to
> add some hooks in some in-kernel structures and functions, which
> makes it impossible to be a module.
Not true - as the classifier example shows, if there's already a
framework that supports hooking loadable modules into some kernel
system, a resource controller can be a module.
>
> In fact, net_cls is the only subsystem that can be a module, and
> make it a module doesn't seem to have real benefit?
Wouldn't it be just as useful as any other module-loadable classifier,
of which there are quite a few?
It's true that net_cls is currently the only subsystem that makes
sense to use as a module, but its existence shows that the concept
isn't too outlandish.
Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists