[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1257266509.26028.3343.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 11:41:49 -0500
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/14] cpumask: simplify sched_rt.c
Greg,
I believe this was mostly your code. Can you review this change.
Thanks,
-- Steve
On Tue, 2009-11-03 at 14:53 +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> find_lowest_rq() wants to call pick_optimal_cpu() on the intersection
> of sched_domain_span(sd) and lowest_mask. Rather than doing a cpus_and
> into a temporary, we can open-code it.
>
> This actually makes the code slightly clearer, IMHO.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
> To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
> ---
> kernel/sched_rt.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------------
> 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/sched_rt.c b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> --- a/kernel/sched_rt.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched_rt.c
> @@ -1115,29 +1115,12 @@ static struct task_struct *pick_next_hig
>
> static DEFINE_PER_CPU(cpumask_var_t, local_cpu_mask);
>
> -static inline int pick_optimal_cpu(int this_cpu,
> - const struct cpumask *mask)
> -{
> - int first;
> -
> - /* "this_cpu" is cheaper to preempt than a remote processor */
> - if ((this_cpu != -1) && cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, mask))
> - return this_cpu;
> -
> - first = cpumask_first(mask);
> - if (first < nr_cpu_ids)
> - return first;
> -
> - return -1;
> -}
> -
> static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_struct *task)
> {
> struct sched_domain *sd;
> struct cpumask *lowest_mask = __get_cpu_var(local_cpu_mask);
> int this_cpu = smp_processor_id();
> int cpu = task_cpu(task);
> - cpumask_var_t domain_mask;
>
> if (task->rt.nr_cpus_allowed == 1)
> return -1; /* No other targets possible */
> @@ -1167,28 +1150,26 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_st
> * Otherwise, we consult the sched_domains span maps to figure
> * out which cpu is logically closest to our hot cache data.
> */
> - if (this_cpu == cpu)
> - this_cpu = -1; /* Skip this_cpu opt if the same */
> + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, lowest_mask))
> + this_cpu = -1; /* Skip this_cpu opt if not among lowest */
>
> - if (alloc_cpumask_var(&domain_mask, GFP_ATOMIC)) {
> - for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> - if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
> - int best_cpu;
> + for_each_domain(cpu, sd) {
> + if (sd->flags & SD_WAKE_AFFINE) {
> + int best_cpu;
>
> - cpumask_and(domain_mask,
> - sched_domain_span(sd),
> - lowest_mask);
> + /*
> + * "this_cpu" is cheaper to preempt than a
> + * remote processor.
> + */
> + if (this_cpu != -1 &&
> + cpumask_test_cpu(this_cpu, sched_domain_span(sd)))
> + return this_cpu;
>
> - best_cpu = pick_optimal_cpu(this_cpu,
> - domain_mask);
> -
> - if (best_cpu != -1) {
> - free_cpumask_var(domain_mask);
> - return best_cpu;
> - }
> - }
> + best_cpu = cpumask_first_and(lowest_mask,
> + sched_domain_span(sd));
> + if (best_cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> + return best_cpu;
> }
> - free_cpumask_var(domain_mask);
> }
>
> /*
> @@ -1196,7 +1177,13 @@ static int find_lowest_rq(struct task_st
> * just give the caller *something* to work with from the compatible
> * locations.
> */
> - return pick_optimal_cpu(this_cpu, lowest_mask);
> + if (this_cpu != -1)
> + return this_cpu;
> +
> + cpu = cpumask_any(lowest_mask);
> + if (cpu < nr_cpu_ids)
> + return cpu;
> + return -1;
> }
>
> /* Will lock the rq it finds */
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists