| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <1257216017.30470.1183.camel@yhuang-dev.sh.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:40:17 +0800
From: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
To: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [BUGFIX for .32] crypto, gcm, fix another complete call in
complete fuction
The flow of the complete function (xxx_done) in gcm.c is as follow:
void complete(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
if (!err) {
err = async_next_step();
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
}
complete_for_next_step(areq, err);
}
But *areq may be destroyed in async_next_step(), this makes
complete_for_next_step() can not work properly. To fix this, one of
following methods is used for each complete function.
- Setup areq for complete_for_next_step if async_next_step() is called.
- Expand complete_for_next_step().
Signed-off-by: Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>
---
crypto/gcm.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
--- a/crypto/gcm.c
+++ b/crypto/gcm.c
@@ -267,8 +267,7 @@ static int gcm_hash_final(struct aead_re
return crypto_ahash_final(ahreq);
}
-static void gcm_hash_final_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+static void gcm_hash_final_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -280,8 +279,7 @@ static void gcm_hash_final_done(struct c
gctx->complete(areq, err);
}
-static void gcm_hash_len_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+static void gcm_hash_len_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -290,6 +288,8 @@ static void gcm_hash_len_done(struct cry
err = gcm_hash_final(req, pctx);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ areq = &pctx->u.ahreq.base;
+ areq->data = req;
}
gcm_hash_final_done(areq, err);
@@ -305,13 +305,14 @@ static void gcm_hash_crypt_remain_done(s
err = gcm_hash_len(req, pctx);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ areq = &pctx->u.ahreq.base;
+ areq->data = req;
}
gcm_hash_len_done(areq, err);
}
-static void gcm_hash_crypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+static void gcm_hash_crypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -325,13 +326,15 @@ static void gcm_hash_crypt_done(struct c
gcm_hash_crypt_remain_done);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ areq = &pctx->u.ahreq.base;
+ areq->data = req;
}
gcm_hash_crypt_remain_done(areq, err);
}
static void gcm_hash_assoc_remain_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+ int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -347,6 +350,8 @@ static void gcm_hash_assoc_remain_done(s
gctx->src, gctx->cryptlen);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ areq = &pctx->u.ahreq.base;
+ areq->data = req;
}
if (remain)
@@ -355,8 +360,7 @@ static void gcm_hash_assoc_remain_done(s
gcm_hash_crypt_remain_done(areq, err);
}
-static void gcm_hash_assoc_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+static void gcm_hash_assoc_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -369,13 +373,14 @@ static void gcm_hash_assoc_done(struct c
gcm_hash_assoc_remain_done);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ areq = &pctx->u.ahreq.base;
+ areq->data = req;
}
gcm_hash_assoc_remain_done(areq, err);
}
-static void gcm_hash_init_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+static void gcm_hash_init_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq, int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -390,6 +395,8 @@ static void gcm_hash_init_done(struct cr
req->assoc, req->assoclen);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ areq = &pctx->u.ahreq.base;
+ areq->data = req;
}
if (remain)
@@ -458,7 +465,7 @@ static void gcm_enc_copy_hash(struct aea
}
static void gcm_enc_hash_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+ int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -470,7 +477,7 @@ static void gcm_enc_hash_done(struct cry
}
static void gcm_encrypt_done(struct crypto_async_request *areq,
- int err)
+ int err)
{
struct aead_request *req = areq->data;
struct crypto_gcm_req_priv_ctx *pctx = crypto_gcm_reqctx(req);
@@ -479,9 +486,13 @@ static void gcm_encrypt_done(struct cryp
err = gcm_hash(req, pctx);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ else if (!err) {
+ crypto_xor(pctx->auth_tag, pctx->iauth_tag, 16);
+ gcm_enc_copy_hash(req, pctx);
+ }
}
- gcm_enc_hash_done(areq, err);
+ aead_request_complete(req, err);
}
static int crypto_gcm_encrypt(struct aead_request *req)
@@ -552,9 +563,11 @@ static void gcm_dec_hash_done(struct cry
err = crypto_ablkcipher_decrypt(abreq);
if (err == -EINPROGRESS || err == -EBUSY)
return;
+ else if (!err)
+ err = crypto_gcm_verify(req, pctx);
}
- gcm_decrypt_done(areq, err);
+ aead_request_complete(req, err);
}
static int crypto_gcm_decrypt(struct aead_request *req)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists