[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20091103172656.GB11535@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 18:26:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Frédéric_Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] Adding general performance benchmarking
subcommand to perf.
* Hitoshi Mitake <mitake@....info.waseda.ac.jp> wrote:
> Adding general performance benchmarking subcommand to perf.
> This patch adds bench/sched-messaging.c.
> This benchmark measures performance of scheduler and IPC mechanisms,
> and is based on hackbench by Rusty Russell.
>
> Example of use:
>
> % perf bench sched messaging # Use default options
> 0.295 # Result is time
> % perf bench sched messaging -p -l 1000 -t
> 2.265
Would be nice to standardize the options too, and offer a help line:
perf bench sched --help
perhaps 'perf bench sched' should list all available benchmark modules,
and print a oneliner summary about each of them?
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists