linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/14] Final cpumask conversion for x86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200911031450.34491.rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2009 14:50:33 +1030
From:	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andy Henroid <andrew.d.henroid@...el.com>,
	Chris Leech <christopher.leech@...el.com>,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...source.com>,
	Mark Langsdorf <mark.langsdorf@....com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: [PATCH 0/14] Final cpumask conversion for x86

After these patches, I can build allmodconfig on 32 and 64 bit x86 with
the obsolete cpumask function definitions and names configured out.  After
3 more patches, we can finally allocate offstack cpumasks with less than
NR_CPUS bits.

I'd appreciate it if the various maintainers picked these up (most are
simple); Andrew, you seem best poised to annoy the others, do you want to
take these?

Thanks!
Rusty.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/