[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m3eiofl2v8.fsf@intrepid.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 22:23:07 +0100
From: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@...waw.pl>
To: Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org>
Cc: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>, Imre Kaloz <kaloz@...nwrt.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] IXP4xx: Ensure index is positive
Karl Hiramoto <karl@...amoto.org> writes:
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/common.c
>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(gpio_to_irq);
>> int irq_to_gpio(int irq)
>> {
>> - int gpio = (irq < 32) ? irq2gpio[irq] : -EINVAL;
>> + int gpio = (irq < 32 && irq >= 0) ? irq2gpio[irq] : -EINVAL;
>> if (gpio == -1)
>> return -EINVAL;
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-ixp4xx/ixp4xx_npe.c
>> @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ err:
>> struct npe *npe_request(int id)
>> {
>> - if (id < NPE_COUNT)
>> + if (id >= 0 && id < NPE_COUNT)
> changing npe_request() to unsigned would probably be better and not
> add to bloat. If your calling these functions with negative
> arguments, your code is buggy then.
Right. Both files in fact.
Even the id < NPE_COUNT test is probably not needed but I can imagine
someone lowering NPE_COUNT. Negative values are unreasonable (though
unsigned type make this unrelevant, of course).
--
Krzysztof Halasa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists