linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] vmscan: Kill hibernation specific reclaim logic and unify it

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200911032300.14790.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Tue, 3 Nov 2009 23:00:14 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	"linux-mm" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 2/5] vmscan: Kill hibernation specific reclaim logic and unify it

On Tuesday 03 November 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi Rafael.
> 
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Monday 02 November 2009, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >> Hi.
> > 
> > Hi,
> > 
> >> KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
> >>>> I haven't given much thought to numa awareness in hibernate code, but I
> >>>> can say that the shrink_all_memory interface is woefully inadequate as
> >>>> far as zone awareness goes. Since lowmem needs to be atomically restored
> >>>> before we can restore highmem, we really need to be able to ask for a
> >>>> particular number of pages of a particular zone type to be freed.
> >>> Honestly, I am not suspend/hibernation expert. Can I ask why caller need to know
> >>> per-zone number of freed pages information? if hibernation don't need highmem.
> >>> following incremental patch prevent highmem reclaim perfectly. Is it enough?
> >> (Disclaimer: I don't think about highmem a lot any more, and might have
> >> forgotten some of the details, or swsusp's algorithms might have
> >> changed. Rafael might need to correct some of this...)
> >>
> >> Imagine that you have a system with 1000 pages of lowmem and 5000 pages
> >> of highmem. Of these, 950 lowmem pages are in use and 500 highmem pages
> >> are in use.
> >>
> >> In order to to be able to save an image, we need to be able to do an
> >> atomic copy of those lowmem pages.
> >>
> >> You might think that we could just copy everything into the spare
> >> highmem pages, but we can't because mapping and unmapping the highmem
> >> pages as we copy the data will leave us with an inconsistent copy.
> > 
> > This isn't the case any more for the mainline hibernate code.  We use highmem
> > for storing image data as well as lowmem.
> 
> Highmem for storing copies of lowmem pages?

It is possible in theory, but I don't think it happens in practice given the
way in which the memory is freed.  Still copy_data_page() takes this
possibility into account.

Thanks,
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/